rachel and i are 100% cool with doing site section collages to explain ecosystem relationships. top image is the sectionjs we suggest taking (i would be inclined to add one more including the cemetery - if time permits). The second image is another redering style. I like the one Johnny posted in an earlier blog a little better.
3.25.2007
rachel and i are 100% cool with doing site section collages to explain ecosystem relationships. top image is the sectionjs we suggest taking (i would be inclined to add one more including the cemetery - if time permits). The second image is another redering style. I like the one Johnny posted in an earlier blog a little better.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
the section styl aboves allow you to use actual site photographs which could be nice to have on our board. Although I do think the section below of the wetland, meadow, forest is great, is it realistic for us to get to that level in the time remaining.
Do you guys have a "clickable" version of that cross-section, so we can see it up close? I may actually like the rendering on this post more, but would like a closer look. It seems more simple/clean, which seems to imply an underlying complexity, which is a good thing.
I do also like the rendering on johnny's post, but I'll reiterate Rachel's q - do we have time for that level of detail?
i don't know why it is not clickable. but if you go to the asla link in the post below and go to the project titled: The Social Life of Water in Villa Tranquila by a chick from harvard you can see it there.
also i agree with justin's comment about the simplicity of the photos and implying a sense of complexity.
check out this link and click on the image of the board
http://www.asla.org/awards/2006/studentawards/494.html
Post a Comment